Computer Decency Act - translation to ολλανδικά
Diclib.com
Λεξικό ChatGPT
Εισάγετε μια λέξη ή φράση σε οποιαδήποτε γλώσσα 👆
Γλώσσα:

Μετάφραση και ανάλυση λέξεων από την τεχνητή νοημοσύνη ChatGPT

Σε αυτήν τη σελίδα μπορείτε να λάβετε μια λεπτομερή ανάλυση μιας λέξης ή μιας φράσης, η οποία δημιουργήθηκε χρησιμοποιώντας το ChatGPT, την καλύτερη τεχνολογία τεχνητής νοημοσύνης μέχρι σήμερα:

  • πώς χρησιμοποιείται η λέξη
  • συχνότητα χρήσης
  • χρησιμοποιείται πιο συχνά στον προφορικό ή γραπτό λόγο
  • επιλογές μετάφρασης λέξεων
  • παραδείγματα χρήσης (πολλές φράσεις με μετάφραση)
  • ετυμολογία

Computer Decency Act - translation to ολλανδικά

ATTEMPT BY THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS TO REGULATE PORNOGRAPHIC MATERIAL ON THE INTERNET
Communications Decency Act of 1996; 1996 Communications Decency Act

Computer Decency Act      
wet van fatsoen op het internet, ongeschreven regels m.b.t. de fatsoensnormen op het internet waaruit censurering voortkomt, CDA
speech acts         
UTTERANCE THAT SERVES A PERFORMATIVE FUNCTION
Speech Act; Speech acts; Speech-act; Speech-act theory; Speech act theory; Speech-acts; Speech Acts Theory; Act speech; Speechact; Speech Acts; Clausal exclamation; Phrasal exclamation; Indirect speech act; Speech acts theory; Computational speech act model; Indirect speech acts
taaldaden, taalhandelingen (gezegden wiens uitspraken leiden tot aktie (bv. belofte, huwelijksaanzoek, dreigement, etc.)
act up         
  • Silence=Death]]" poster
  • Anti-Homosexuality Bill]]
INTERNATIONAL AIDS ACTIVISM, DIRECT ACTION AND ADVOCACY GROUP
AIDS Coalition To Unleash Power; ACT-UP; Act Up; Act up; Like a Prayer (documentary); Actup; ACT Up; Aids Coalition to Unleash Power; AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power; The AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power; ACT UP-Paris; ACTUP; AIDS Coalition to Unleash power; ACT UP New York
lastig zijn, vervelend zijn; zich vreemd of abnormaal gedragen; zich ongeordend gedragen, ongehoorzaam zijn; zich zo gedragen dat de aandacht wordt getrokken

Ορισμός

Communications Decency Act
<legal> (CDA) An amendment to the U.S. 1996 Telecommunications Bill that went into effect on 1996-02-08. The law, originally proposed by Senator James Exon to protect children from obscenity on the Internet, ended up making it punishable by fines of up to $250,000 to post indecent language on the Internet anywhere that a minor could read it. Thousands of outraged Internet users turned their {web pages} black in protest or displayed the {Electronic Frontier Foundation}'s special icons. On 1996-06-12, a three-judge panel in Philadelphia ruled the CDA unconstitutional and issued an injunction against the United States Justice Department forbidding them to enforce the "indecency" provisions of the law. Internet users celebrated by displaying an animated "Free Speech" fireworks icon to their web pages, courtesy of the {Voters Telecommunications Watch}. The Justice Department appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. (1996-11-03)

Βικιπαίδεια

Communications Decency Act

The Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) was the United States Congress's first notable attempt to regulate pornographic material on the Internet. In the 1997 landmark case Reno v. ACLU, the United States Supreme Court unanimously struck the act's anti-indecency provisions.

The Act is the short name of Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as specified in Section 501 of the 1996 Act. Senators James Exon and Slade Gorton introduced it to the Senate Committee of Commerce, Science, and Transportation in 1995. The amendment that became the CDA was added to the Telecommunications Act in the Senate by an 81–18 vote on June 15, 1995.

As eventually passed by Congress, Title V affected the Internet (and online communications) in two significant ways. First, it attempted to regulate both indecency (when available to children) and obscenity in cyberspace. Second, Section 230 of title 47 of the U.S. Code, part of a codification of the Communications Act of 1934 (Section 9 of the Communications Decency Act / Section 509 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) has been interpreted to mean that operators of Internet services are not publishers (and thus not legally liable for the words of third parties who use their services).